Does Idaho Conversational AI Safety Act (S 1297) require Risk Assessment?

Idaho • enacted

Yes — 2 provisions

Requirements at a glance

This regulation imposes 6 specific requirements for Risk Assessment across 2 provisions:

Suicidal Ideation Response Protocol #

Obligation:
Risk Assessment
pending
Effective:
Jul 1, 2027
Risk tier:
limited-risk
Scope:
Operators of conversational AI services made available to the public in Idaho (§ 48-2102(6))
upcomingcross-domain
Structured as an adoption duty with a reasonable-efforts floor, not California SB 243's engagement gate: Idaho does not bar the service from operating without a protocol, does not require the protocol to be published, and imposes no annual reporting. The practical consequence is that the crisis protocol is only visible to the Attorney General on investigation.

Requirements

RequirementDetails
Adopt a crisis protocolAdopt a protocol for the conversational AI service to respond to user prompts regarding suicidal ideation (§ 48-2103(2))
Crisis referral floorThe protocol must include, at minimum, making reasonable efforts to provide a response referring users to crisis service providers such as a suicide hotline, crisis text line, or other appropriate crisis services (§ 48-2103(2))

Penalties

ViolationFine
Any violation of the chapterInjunction plus $1,000 per violation, capped at $500,000 per operator, or actual damages, whichever is greater, sought by the Attorney General (§ 48-2105(1)-(2))

Minor Protection Measures #

Obligation:
Risk Assessment
pending
Effective:
Jul 1, 2027
Risk tier:
limited-risk
Scope:
Operators, as to minor account holders — account holders whom the operator has actual knowledge or reasonable certainty are under 18 (§ 48-2102(4)-(5))
upcominghigh-impact
The § 48-2104(2) ban on variable-ratio rewards is the first US AI statute to regulate an engagement mechanic by name rather than its effects, and it is intent-qualified — the reward must be given with intent to encourage increased engagement. Actual-knowledge-or-reasonable-certainty framing means the duties bite only once an operator has age signals, so age assurance is not itself mandated.

Requirements

RequirementDetails
No variable-ratio rewardsWhere the operator knows or has reasonable certainty that an account holder is a minor, do not provide points or similar rewards at unpredictable intervals with the intent to encourage increased engagement (§ 48-2104(2))
Sexual content preventionFor minor account holders, institute reasonable measures to prevent the service from producing visual material of sexually explicit conduct (§ 48-2104(3)(a))
No solicitationFor minor account holders, institute reasonable measures to prevent the service from generating direct statements that the account holder should engage in sexually explicit conduct (§ 48-2104(3)(b))
No sexual objectificationFor minor account holders, institute reasonable measures to prevent the service from generating statements that sexually objectify the account holder (§ 48-2104(3)(c))

Penalties

ViolationFine
Any violation of the chapterInjunction plus $1,000 per violation, capped at $500,000 per operator, or actual damages, whichever is greater, sought by the Attorney General (§ 48-2105(1)-(2))
View full regulation View obligation Obligation matrix