Does Iowa Conversational AI Services Act (SF 2417) require Risk Assessment?

Iowa • enacted

Yes — 2 provisions

Requirements at a glance

This regulation imposes 6 specific requirements for Risk Assessment across 2 provisions:

Minor Engagement and Sexual Content Safeguards #

Obligation:
Risk Assessment
enacted
Effective:
Jul 1, 2027
Risk tier:
limited-risk
Scope:
Operators of conversational AI services, as to minor users and minor account holders — a minor being an individual the operator knows is, or is reasonably certain is, under eighteen years of age (§ 554J.1(3)); "sexually explicit conduct" and "visual depiction" take their 18 U.S.C. § 2256 meanings (§§ 554J.1(5)-(6))
high-impactupcoming
The variable-reward bar in § 554J.2(2) is the first US AI statute to regulate an engagement mechanic rather than an output. It borrows the language of intermittent reinforcement — "points or similar rewards at unpredictable intervals" — and is gated on intent to encourage increased engagement, which makes internal growth documents the natural evidence. Note the drafting asymmetry: § 554J.2(2) reaches a "minor user" while § 554J.2(3) reaches a "minor account holder", so the reward bar plausibly applies without an account.

Requirements

RequirementDetails
No variable-reward engagement mechanicsDo not provide a minor user with points or similar rewards at unpredictable intervals with the intent to encourage increased engagement with the service (§ 554J.2(2))
Reasonable measures against sexual depictionsInstitute reasonable measures to prevent the service from producing visual depictions of sexually explicit material for minor account holders (§ 554J.2(3)(a))
Reasonable measures against solicitationInstitute reasonable measures to prevent the service from stating that a minor account holder should engage in sexually explicit conduct (§ 554J.2(3)(b))
Reasonable measures against objectificationInstitute reasonable measures to prevent the service from sexually objectifying a minor account holder (§ 554J.2(3)(c))

Penalties

ViolationFine
Any violation of chapter 554JInjunction plus the greater of actual damages or a civil penalty of $1,000 per violation, capped at $500,000 per operator (§ 554J.6(1))
EnforcementAttorney General only; no private right of action (§ 554J.6(2), § 554J.6(4))

Suicide and Self-Harm Response Protocol #

Obligation:
Risk Assessment
enacted
Effective:
Jul 1, 2027
Risk tier:
limited-risk
Scope:
Operators of conversational AI services; the duty runs to all users, not only minors (§ 554J.4)
high-impactupcomingcross-domain
Compare California SB 243 § 22602(b), which makes the protocol a precondition on operating at all and requires publication on the operator's website. Iowa requires only that the protocol be adopted: no gate, no publication, no annual reporting to a public-health body. The floor is lower, and there is no plaintiff-facing document — the Attorney General would have to ask for the protocol to see it.

Requirements

RequirementDetails
Adopt a protocolAdopt protocols for the conversational AI service for responding to user prompts regarding suicidal ideation or self-harm (§ 554J.4)
Crisis referralThe protocol must include making reasonable efforts to refer the user to crisis service providers such as a suicide hotline, crisis text line, or other appropriate crisis service (§ 554J.4)

Penalties

ViolationFine
Any violation of chapter 554JInjunction plus the greater of actual damages or a civil penalty of $1,000 per violation, capped at $500,000 per operator (§ 554J.6(1))
EnforcementAttorney General only; no private right of action (§ 554J.6(2), § 554J.6(4))
View full regulation View obligation Obligation matrix