Does Law Promoting the Use of Artificial Intelligence (Ley 31814) and Implementing Regulation require Explainability?

Peru • phased enforcement

Yes — 1 provision

Requirements at a glance

This regulation imposes 1 specific requirement for Explainability across 1 provision:

Explanation of Rights-Affecting Automated Decisions #

Obligation:
Explainability
pending
Effective:
Sep 10, 2026
Risk tier:
high-risk
Scope:
Private-sector and public developers and deployers of high-risk AI systems whose decisions impact human rights (Reglamento Arts. 25.1, 25.3)
upcoming
Same sector phase-in as the rest of Art. 25: earliest tier (health, education, justice, security, economy, finance) by 2026-09-10, remaining sectors through 2029-09-10, with extended MYPE deadlines.

Requirements

RequirementDetails
Explanation of outcomesArt. 25.3: where the system takes decisions that impact human rights, affected users must be guaranteed an explanation of its results, through mechanisms that make the key criteria and factors behind the automated decision comprehensible in accessible language

Penalties

ViolationFine
No administrative finesReferral-based enforcement only (Reglamento Arts. 34, 36.2); no AI-specific sanctions regime
View full regulation View obligation Obligation matrix