Does Law Promoting the Use of Artificial Intelligence (Ley 31814) and Implementing Regulation require Explainability?
Peru • phased enforcement
Yes — 1 provision
Requirements at a glance
This regulation imposes 1 specific requirement for Explainability across 1 provision:
- Explanation of outcomes — Art. 25.3: where the system takes decisions that impact human rights, affected users must be guaranteed an explanation of its results, through mechanisms that make the key criteria and factors behind the automated decision comprehensible in accessible language
Explanation of Rights-Affecting Automated Decisions #
Same sector phase-in as the rest of Art. 25: earliest tier (health, education, justice, security, economy, finance) by 2026-09-10, remaining sectors through 2029-09-10, with extended MYPE deadlines.
Requirements
| Requirement | Details |
|---|---|
| Explanation of outcomes | Art. 25.3: where the system takes decisions that impact human rights, affected users must be guaranteed an explanation of its results, through mechanisms that make the key criteria and factors behind the automated decision comprehensible in accessible language |
Penalties
| Violation | Fine |
|---|---|
| No administrative fines | Referral-based enforcement only (Reglamento Arts. 34, 36.2); no AI-specific sanctions regime |