Does Utah AI Policy Act (stack — SB 149 + 2025 + 2026 amendments) require Risk Assessment?

Utah • enforcing

Yes — 1 provision

Requirements at a glance

This regulation imposes 5 specific requirements for Risk Assessment across 1 provision:

Mental Health Chatbot Safety Policy

Copy link to this provision

Obligation:
Record Keeping
enforcing
Effective:
May 7, 2025
Risk tier:
high-risk
Scope:
Mental health chatbot suppliers seeking the affirmative defense to administrative or civil liability alleged under §58-1-501(1) or (2); policy/documentation/filing duties here are conditions of that defense (§58-60-118(2),(6)), not a universal supplier mandate
The defense does not bar an enforcement action or license a chatbot as a therapist (§58-60-118(7)); separate Chapter 72a consumer-protection duties remain applicable

Requirements

RequirementDetails
Defense policyTo qualify, create, maintain and implement a written policy covering intended purposes, therapist involvement, clinical best practices, testing, risk identification, user reporting, acute-risk protocols, safety reviews, safe-use instructions, AI-awareness disclosure, engagement-over-safety prohibition, non-discrimination, HIPAA compliance
DocumentationTo qualify, maintain documentation of foundation models used, training data, HIPAA compliance, user data practices, ongoing accuracy/safety efforts
FilingTo claim the defense, file the required policy and supplier/chatbot information with the Division of Consumer Protection in its required manner and pay the filing fee (§58-60-118(4)); the Division may impose an annual filing fee (§58-60-118(5)(b))
Compliance conditionTo qualify, comply with all requirements of the filed policy at the time of the alleged violation (§58-60-118(2)(d))
Defense limitsThe defense does not bar the Division from bringing the specified enforcement action, does not recognize a chatbot as a licensed therapist, and does not displace separate Chapter 72a consumer-protection duties (§58-60-118(6)-(7))

Penalties

ViolationFine
Affirmative defenseLimited to administrative or civil actions alleging §58-1-501(1) or (2); it does not bar the Division from bringing such an action and does not extend to separate Chapter 72a consumer-protection liability (§58-60-118(6)-(7))
View full regulation View obligation Obligation matrix