EveryAILaw.comDoes AI Amendments Law (Informatization Law and Administrative Responsibility Code) require Human Oversight?
Uzbekistan • enforcing
Yes — 1 provision
Requirements at a glance
This regulation imposes 2 specific requirements for Human Oversight across 1 provision:
- No sole reliance on AI conclusions — When making legally significant decisions affecting human rights and freedoms, it is not permitted to rely exclusively on the conclusions of information resources and information systems created on the basis of AI technologies (Art. 7-1, para 2)
- No-harm principle — Information resources created using AI and information systems operating on AI technologies must not harm a person, their life, health, freedom, honor, dignity, or violate their other inalienable rights (Art. 7-1, para 1)
Human Oversight of Legally Significant Decisions
An amending law buried inside the general informatization code, easy to miss: new Article 7-1 of the Law "On Informatization" bans sole reliance on AI system conclusions for any legally significant decision touching human rights and freedoms. No AI-specific statute exists to flag it — the duty binds private deployers of rights-affecting automated decisions through a two-paragraph insertion.
Penalties qualification: None specified for Article 7-1 itself; the amending law's only new penalty (Art. 46-2 CAO part 2) targets unlawful personal data processing with AI.
Requirements
| Requirement | Details |
|---|---|
| No sole reliance on AI conclusions | When making legally significant decisions affecting human rights and freedoms, it is not permitted to rely exclusively on the conclusions of information resources and information systems created on the basis of AI technologies (Art. 7-1, para 2) |
| No-harm principle | Information resources created using AI and information systems operating on AI technologies must not harm a person, their life, health, freedom, honor, dignity, or violate their other inalienable rights (Art. 7-1, para 1) |