Does Washington AI Companion Chatbots Act (ESHB 2225) require Incident Reporting?

Washington • enacted

Yes — 1 provision

Requirements at a glance

This regulation imposes 3 specific requirements for Incident Reporting across 1 provision:

Public Protocol and Crisis Referral Disclosure #

Obligation:
Incident Reporting
enacted
Effective:
Jan 1, 2027
Risk tier:
limited-risk
Scope:
Operators making available or deploying an AI companion chatbot for users in Washington (Sec. 2(4))
upcoming
No regulator receives this. Like Oregon, Washington makes the crisis-referral count a public self-disclosure rather than a filing — but it must appear both on the operator's websites and inside every mobile or web application through which the companion is offered, which is a stricter placement duty than either California or Oregon imposes. Sec. 5(3) sets no annual deadline, so the disclosure is a standing obligation that must carry the preceding calendar year's count.

Requirements

RequirementDetails
Publish protocol detailsPublicly disclose on the operator's website or websites, and within any mobile or web-based application through which the AI companion is made available, the details of the Sec. 5 protocols (Sec. 5(3))
Publish safeguardsThe disclosure must include the safeguards used to detect and respond to expressions of suicidal ideation or self-harm (Sec. 5(3))
Publish referral countsThe disclosure must include the number of crisis referral notifications issued to users in the preceding calendar year (Sec. 5(3))

Penalties

ViolationFine
Consumer Protection Act predicateViolation is an unfair or deceptive act in trade or commerce under ch. 19.86 RCW (Sec. 6); no penalty amount is set in this act
Attorney General enforcementInjunctive relief and civil penalties under RCW 19.86.080 and RCW 19.86.140
Private right of actionUnder RCW 19.86.090 — actual damages, discretionary trebling capped at $25,000, plus attorney fees and costs
View full regulation View obligation Obligation matrix