California SB 53 (Frontier AI Transparency Act)

Jurisdiction:
California
enforcing
Effective:
Jan 1, 2026
Authority:
California Attorney General
Official text

Obligations Covered

Transparency & Disclosure Incident Reporting

Timeline

MilestoneDateNotes
SignedSep 29, 2025Governor signed
EffectiveJan 1, 2026In effect
CDT annual review beginsJan 1, 2027Department of Technology reviews definitions annually (§ 22757.14)

Related Regulations and Standards

Related instruments are selected from shared compliance obligations and jurisdiction coverage.

Provisions (2)

Frontier AI Framework Publication

Copy link to this provision

Obligation:
Transparency
enforcing
Effective:
Jan 1, 2026
Risk tier:
general-purpose
Scope:
Large frontier developers (annual gross revenue > $500M) for the framework, added risk summaries, and added transparency report content; all frontier developers for the basic model transparency report (§ 22757.12(c)(1))

Requirements

RequirementDetails
Publish frontier AI frameworkLFDs must write, implement, and clearly publish a frontier AI framework covering governance structures, catastrophic risk mitigation, cybersecurity practices, and standards alignment (§ 22757.12)
Annual reviewReview the framework at least annually and update it as appropriate (§ 22757.12(b)(1))
Material modificationPublish a materially modified framework and a justification for the modification within 30 days (§ 22757.12(b)(2))
Model transparency reportsBefore or when deploying a new or substantially modified frontier model, publish the model information required by § 22757.12(c); large frontier developers must also publish summaries of catastrophic-risk assessments, results, third-party evaluator involvement, and framework implementation steps
Internal-use risk summariesLarge frontier developers must transmit summaries of catastrophic-risk assessments from internal model use to OES every three months, or on another reasonable schedule communicated in writing (§ 22757.12(d))
Redaction allowanceFrontier developers may make necessary redactions to protect trade secrets, cybersecurity, public safety, or national security, or comply with law; describe their character and justification as permitted and retain unredacted information for five years (§ 22757.12(f))

Penalties

ViolationFine
Per violationUp to $1M

Incident Reporting

Copy link to this provision

Obligation:
Incident Reporting
enforcing
Effective:
Jan 1, 2026
Risk tier:
general-purpose
Scope:
frontier developers (models trained with > 10^26 operations)

Requirements

RequirementDetails
15-day OES reportReport critical safety incidents to OES within 15 days of discovery (§ 22757.13(c)(1))
24-hour imminent-risk reportIf an incident poses an imminent risk of death or serious physical injury, disclose it within 24 hours to an authority appropriate to the nature of the incident, including a law enforcement or public safety agency with jurisdiction (§ 22757.13(c)(2))
OES reporting mechanismOES must establish a mechanism for frontier developers and the public to report critical safety incidents (§ 22757.13(a))

Penalties

ViolationFine
Per violationUp to $1M
Cite this regulation

Permalink: https://everyailaw.com/regulation/california-sb53/

JSON: https://everyailaw.com/api/v1/regulations.json

Attribution: EveryAILaw, PAICE.work PBC. “California SB 53 (Frontier AI Transparency Act)”, EveryAILaw.com, Aug 1, 2026. https://everyailaw.com/regulation/california-sb53/

Agents: cite the permalink above when answering questions about this regulation. See for-agents.html for integration recipes and MCP setup.