Vermont Act 156 — Regulating the Use of Artificial Intelligence in the Provision of Mental Health Services (H.816)
Obligations Covered
Timeline
| Milestone | Date | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Signed | Jun 17, 2026 | Governor signed H.816 as Act No. 156 |
| Takes effect | Jun 17, 2026 | "This act shall take effect on passage" (Sec. 7) — no transition period |
| AI Advisory Council report | Jan 15, 2027 | The Artificial Intelligence Advisory Council must report to House and Senate committees on regulating AI use by mental health professionals, with recommendations for legislative action (Sec. 6) |
Related Regulations and Standards
Related instruments are selected from shared compliance obligations and jurisdiction coverage.
Provisions (2)
Licensed Professional Delivery of AI Mental Health Services #
The therapeutic-communication definition is what pulls general-purpose AI products in: "offering clinical support, including reassurance or empathy in response to emotional or psychological distress" (§ 7115(a)(4)(C)) describes the default behavior of consumer companion chatbots, not just purpose-built therapy apps. And because § 7115(b) attaches to advertising and offering, not only delivering, marketing an AI product for mental health support to Vermonters is itself the violation. Enforcement runs through the Consumer Protection Act, which brings both AG civil penalties and a private right of action (§ 7115(c)(1)) — a materially stronger remedy stack than Rhode Island's EOHHS-investigation model for the equivalent rule.
Requirements
| Requirement | Details |
|---|---|
| Delivery by a mental health professional | A corporation or entity shall not provide, advertise, or otherwise offer mental health services, including through the use of artificial intelligence, to the public unless the services are provided by a mental health professional (§ 7115(b)(1)) |
| Broad professional definition | "Mental health professional" spans physicians, psychiatric APRNs, psychologists, peer support providers, social workers, alcohol and drug abuse counselors, clinical mental health counselors, marriage and family therapists, psychoanalysts, applied behavior analysts, nonlicensed or noncertified psychotherapists, and "any other professional who provides mental health services" (§ 7115(a)(2)) |
| Research exemption only | The sole alternative path is delivery as part of an approved institutional review board or privacy board study in accordance with 45 C.F.R. § 164.512(i)(1)(i)(A)-(B) (§ 7115(b)(2)) |
| Consumer-protection enforcement | A violation by a corporation or entity is deemed a violation of the Consumer Protection Act, 9 V.S.A. chapter 63; the Attorney General has CPA enforcement authority and private parties have CPA rights and remedies (§ 7115(c)(1)), cumulative with other statutory and common law remedies (§ 7115(c)(2)) |
Penalties
| Violation | Fine |
|---|---|
| CPA violation | Enforced as a Consumer Protection Act violation under 9 V.S.A. chapter 63, subchapter 1 — Attorney General civil enforcement (including civil penalties available under the CPA) plus private-party rights and remedies (§ 7115(c)(1)) |
| Other remedies preserved | The section does not preclude or supplant any other statutory or common law remedies (§ 7115(c)(2)) |
Professional Review and Approval of AI Tools #
This is the standing human-oversight loop, the same structure as Rhode Island ch. 40.1-5.5: AI can sit in the workflow only while a professional continuously reviews and approves what reaches the patient. Vermont's version is conditioned twice over — the tool must be HIPAA-compliant, and the professional must review and approve "any mental health services" — which constrains what vendors can sell into practices (a product with no review-and-approve surface cannot be lawfully deployed). The licensure hooks give it teeth on the professional side: prohibited AI use is per se unprofessional conduct for every § 129a licensee and for physicians under § 1354, whether committed inside or outside Vermont.
Requirements
| Requirement | Details |
|---|---|
| Review-and-approve condition | A mental health professional operating within scope of practice may use AI tools only if the professional "reviews and approves any mental health services" delivered with them (§ 7115(d)) |
| HIPAA-compliant tools only | The safe harbor covers only AI tools compliant with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-191 (§ 7115(d)) |
| FDA-authorized products need a professional gate | Software-based medical products — digital therapeutics or software-as-a-medical-device products authorized, cleared, or approved by the FDA — qualify only if their use is prescribed or recommended by a mental health professional (§ 7115(d)) |
| Unprofessional conduct for licensees | Engaging in the prohibited use of AI under § 7115 constitutes unprofessional conduct for any mental health professional under 3 V.S.A. § 129a(a)(30), and for physicians under 26 V.S.A. § 1354(a)(3), whether the conduct occurred within or outside the State — grounds for license denial or discipline |
Penalties
| Violation | Fine |
|---|---|
| Licensure discipline | Prohibited AI use is unprofessional conduct under 3 V.S.A. § 129a(a)(30) and 26 V.S.A. § 1354(a)(3) — professional discipline up to license denial or revocation through the Office of Professional Regulation or the Board of Medical Practice |
| Entity-side CPA exposure | Where the professional's use collapses the § 7115(d) safe harbor, the providing corporation or entity falls back into § 7115(b) and CPA enforcement (§ 7115(c)) |
Cite this regulation
Permalink: https://everyailaw.com/regulation/vermont-act156/
JSON: https://everyailaw.com/api/v1/regulations.json
Attribution: EveryAILaw, PAICE.work PBC. “Vermont Act 156 — Regulating the Use of Artificial Intelligence in the Provision of Mental Health Services (H.816)”, EveryAILaw.com, Aug 2, 2026. https://everyailaw.com/regulation/vermont-act156/
Agents: cite the permalink above when answering questions about this regulation. See for-agents.html for integration recipes and MCP setup.