Vermont Act 156 — Regulating the Use of Artificial Intelligence in the Provision of Mental Health Services (H.816)

Jurisdiction:
Vermont
enforcing
Effective:
Jun 17, 2026
Authority:
Vermont Attorney General
Official text

Obligations Covered

Human Oversight

Timeline

MilestoneDateNotes
SignedJun 17, 2026Governor signed H.816 as Act No. 156
Takes effectJun 17, 2026"This act shall take effect on passage" (Sec. 7) — no transition period
AI Advisory Council reportJan 15, 2027The Artificial Intelligence Advisory Council must report to House and Senate committees on regulating AI use by mental health professionals, with recommendations for legislative action (Sec. 6)

Related Regulations and Standards

Related instruments are selected from shared compliance obligations and jurisdiction coverage.

Provisions (2)

Licensed Professional Delivery of AI Mental Health Services #

Obligation:
Human Oversight
enforcing
Effective:
Jun 17, 2026
Risk tier:
sector-specific
Scope:
Any corporation or entity that provides, advertises, or otherwise offers mental health services to the public, "including through the use of artificial intelligence" (§ 7115(b)). "Mental health services" means services to diagnose, treat, or address mental or behavioral health through therapeutic communications and therapeutic decisions (§ 7115(a)(3)); therapeutic communication is defined broadly to include direct client interactions, clinical guidance, clinical support "including reassurance or empathy in response to emotional or psychological distress", treatment-plan collaboration, and growth-oriented feedback (§ 7115(a)(4)). Exempt: services provided as part of an approved IRB or privacy-board study under 45 C.F.R. § 164.512(i)(1)(i)(A)-(B) (§ 7115(b)(2))
high-impactcross-domain
The therapeutic-communication definition is what pulls general-purpose AI products in: "offering clinical support, including reassurance or empathy in response to emotional or psychological distress" (§ 7115(a)(4)(C)) describes the default behavior of consumer companion chatbots, not just purpose-built therapy apps. And because § 7115(b) attaches to advertising and offering, not only delivering, marketing an AI product for mental health support to Vermonters is itself the violation. Enforcement runs through the Consumer Protection Act, which brings both AG civil penalties and a private right of action (§ 7115(c)(1)) — a materially stronger remedy stack than Rhode Island's EOHHS-investigation model for the equivalent rule.

Requirements

RequirementDetails
Delivery by a mental health professionalA corporation or entity shall not provide, advertise, or otherwise offer mental health services, including through the use of artificial intelligence, to the public unless the services are provided by a mental health professional (§ 7115(b)(1))
Broad professional definition"Mental health professional" spans physicians, psychiatric APRNs, psychologists, peer support providers, social workers, alcohol and drug abuse counselors, clinical mental health counselors, marriage and family therapists, psychoanalysts, applied behavior analysts, nonlicensed or noncertified psychotherapists, and "any other professional who provides mental health services" (§ 7115(a)(2))
Research exemption onlyThe sole alternative path is delivery as part of an approved institutional review board or privacy board study in accordance with 45 C.F.R. § 164.512(i)(1)(i)(A)-(B) (§ 7115(b)(2))
Consumer-protection enforcementA violation by a corporation or entity is deemed a violation of the Consumer Protection Act, 9 V.S.A. chapter 63; the Attorney General has CPA enforcement authority and private parties have CPA rights and remedies (§ 7115(c)(1)), cumulative with other statutory and common law remedies (§ 7115(c)(2))

Penalties

ViolationFine
CPA violationEnforced as a Consumer Protection Act violation under 9 V.S.A. chapter 63, subchapter 1 — Attorney General civil enforcement (including civil penalties available under the CPA) plus private-party rights and remedies (§ 7115(c)(1))
Other remedies preservedThe section does not preclude or supplant any other statutory or common law remedies (§ 7115(c)(2))

Professional Review and Approval of AI Tools #

Obligation:
Human Oversight
enforcing
Effective:
Jun 17, 2026
Risk tier:
sector-specific
Scope:
Mental health professionals operating within their scope of practice who use artificial intelligence tools in delivering mental health services, and the vendors whose tools they deploy — the safe harbor is conditioned on the tool being HIPAA-compliant and on the professional reviewing and approving any mental health services (§ 7115(d))
high-impact
This is the standing human-oversight loop, the same structure as Rhode Island ch. 40.1-5.5: AI can sit in the workflow only while a professional continuously reviews and approves what reaches the patient. Vermont's version is conditioned twice over — the tool must be HIPAA-compliant, and the professional must review and approve "any mental health services" — which constrains what vendors can sell into practices (a product with no review-and-approve surface cannot be lawfully deployed). The licensure hooks give it teeth on the professional side: prohibited AI use is per se unprofessional conduct for every § 129a licensee and for physicians under § 1354, whether committed inside or outside Vermont.

Requirements

RequirementDetails
Review-and-approve conditionA mental health professional operating within scope of practice may use AI tools only if the professional "reviews and approves any mental health services" delivered with them (§ 7115(d))
HIPAA-compliant tools onlyThe safe harbor covers only AI tools compliant with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-191 (§ 7115(d))
FDA-authorized products need a professional gateSoftware-based medical products — digital therapeutics or software-as-a-medical-device products authorized, cleared, or approved by the FDA — qualify only if their use is prescribed or recommended by a mental health professional (§ 7115(d))
Unprofessional conduct for licenseesEngaging in the prohibited use of AI under § 7115 constitutes unprofessional conduct for any mental health professional under 3 V.S.A. § 129a(a)(30), and for physicians under 26 V.S.A. § 1354(a)(3), whether the conduct occurred within or outside the State — grounds for license denial or discipline

Penalties

ViolationFine
Licensure disciplineProhibited AI use is unprofessional conduct under 3 V.S.A. § 129a(a)(30) and 26 V.S.A. § 1354(a)(3) — professional discipline up to license denial or revocation through the Office of Professional Regulation or the Board of Medical Practice
Entity-side CPA exposureWhere the professional's use collapses the § 7115(d) safe harbor, the providing corporation or entity falls back into § 7115(b) and CPA enforcement (§ 7115(c))
Cite this regulation

Permalink: https://everyailaw.com/regulation/vermont-act156/

JSON: https://everyailaw.com/api/v1/regulations.json

Attribution: EveryAILaw, PAICE.work PBC. “Vermont Act 156 — Regulating the Use of Artificial Intelligence in the Provision of Mental Health Services (H.816)”, EveryAILaw.com, Aug 2, 2026. https://everyailaw.com/regulation/vermont-act156/

Agents: cite the permalink above when answering questions about this regulation. See for-agents.html for integration recipes and MCP setup.