EveryAILaw.com

The duty runs to private healthcare providers and the facilities that employ them, not to a state agency — which is what puts it in scope here rather than treating it as a licensing rule, and it lands squarely on the ambient-scribe vendors selling into those private practices: the practice cannot lawfully deploy a scribe without a patient notification path and a per-visit review-and-attest step built into the workflow, with no sampling allowance and no materiality threshold. The statute's title advertises only notification; the review duty is the operative half and is easy to miss. Note the narrowing phrase "for that sole purpose" — the duty as drafted attaches to documentation use, and the Act says nothing about AI used for diagnosis or triage. The operative chapter is a single sentence creating these two linked duties, so they are modelled as one provision rather than two.