EveryAILaw.com

For an operator of a companion chatbot platform within § 22601(b) and (e), the artificiality-notice duty uses a reasonable-person test. Section 22601(b)(2) excludes specified customer-service, video-game, and voice-assistant interactions. The minor-notice and three-hour reminder rows below describe Section 22602(c)(1)-(2) as chaptered by SB 243 in 2025. Retained SB 1119 (Chapter 190, Statutes of 2026), Section 1, rewrites Section 22602 without subdivision (c). Its separately added Section 21812 becomes operative July 1, 2027 under subdivision (e). This record does not establish when the Section 22602 rewrite operates or treat the two regimes as equivalent. The existing status and date fields are unchanged; they do not resolve this amendment-timing question.

The duty is structured as a gate: without the protocol, the operator must prevent the chatbot from engaging with users. The operator must publish details of the protocol, not necessarily the full internal document (§ 22602(b)(2)). The minor sexual-content row below describes Section 22602(c)(3) as chaptered by SB 243 in 2025. Retained SB 1119 Section 1 rewrites Section 22602 without subdivision (c); its operative timing is not established here. The separately added Section 21812 expressly becomes operative July 1, 2027, with distinct child-user scope and remedies; it is not treated here as a one-for-one replacement. Existing status and date fields remain unchanged and do not decide that transition.

Reporting runs to a public-health body rather than a regulator, and the Office must publish the data, so the reports become a public dataset on how often companion chatbots encounter user self-harm. The § 22603(d) requirement to use evidence-based measurement methods means the counting methodology is itself regulated.